|
Light
v/s Traditional Systems
Marked
differences exist between the traditional systems about teaching reading-writing
and the "Light" system that, in terms of results, explain the effectiveness
and the efficiency of the current model, versus the one that is presented
here, as shown in the following table:
| Traditional
Models & Systems |
Light
System |
| These
systems start teaching words, phrases and even sentences, being obtained
the letter that is wanted to teach in particular of a word that begins
with a particular letter. |
You
begin teaching the letters of the alphabet, by identifying their sounds,
just as we pronounce them. Once the letters are identified, words
with full meaning are formed. |
| Within
the framework the name of the letter is taught and not its real sound.
On the contrary, regarding the "Light" strategy, the student never
learns appropriately the real sounds of the alphabet, with that which
his enunciation and pronunciation leave making increasingly faulty
and he explains the current state of these characteristics in the
Chilean media people. |
Initially,
the "Light" strategy never teaches the name of the letter, only its
sound. Thus, it is a proper pronunciation and enunciation are acquired
from the beginning and the abstract signs, become concrete, because
if the student already knows the sound, it can identify the related
sign. Only when the student already acquired the ability of the reading,
can he or she be taught the name of the letters. This is generally
recommended in Second Grade. |
| Those
systems become trained keeping in mind how the boy thinks. The relationship
figure-word is applied, to reinforce the identification and memorization
of the word in question, and that then that allows to identify rationally,
the first letter of the word to teach, for its name. |
"Light"
becomes trained thinking in how the student learns, how the child
acquires new information more than how he thinks addressing intuitive-rational
processes that initially prevail over purely rational ones and facilitate
quick learning. |
| They
become trained the letters one by one, with the help of extensive
and tedious exercises, in a sequence that it explains the slowness
and the process reader's complexity. Then, to a complicated design
of the mentioned process, a quantity of exercises must be added that
allows the student to a less motivation to learn gradually, that finishes
privileging processes of memorization, instead of the understanding. |
Letters
and their corresponding sounds, are introduced to the student once
and for all. First all the vowels and then, all the consonants, which
causes an immediate and natural Teacher-student interaction to the
formation of the first words and phrases with meaning, which explains
the speed with which all types of students learn. |
| Students
with learning problems, for example, dyslexia, relating to not clinical
or pathological cases of mental retardation, in general, they still
don't learn, after several years, being sent to special schools, assuming
that they will no longer learn, for the concept that one has of that
dysfunction and where the teaching of manual tasks and the variety
of games are emphasized for those children. |
In
this case, all the students learn, even, those potentially dyslexics
and those whose dysfunction you can perceive and clearly diagnose,
which disappears during the reading process thanks to the fact that
they learn how to recognize the sounds of the letters and to identify
them solidly and unforgettably, which allows them to learn in a short
time and be integrated to their classmates' learning pace. |
|
|
|
|